Public managers’ trust in citizens and their preferences for behavioral policy instruments: evidence from a mixed-methods study
نویسندگان
چکیده
Abstract Local public managers increasingly use behavioral policy instruments to influence the behavior of citizens. However, despite their increased reliance on these instruments, there is little evidence why local manager would prefer over classic stick, carrot or sermon-type instruments. We conduct a mixed-methods study, combining stated-preference survey and two focus groups, examine whether senior (directors deputy directors) in Flanders explore trust citizens (perceptions citizen's ability, benevolence integrity) affects preferences for The results indicate that some areas, such as health, nuisance road safety, appear more willing than sticks carrots, but not sermons. Furthermore, we find managers’ does significantly affect political economic motives do play role Finally, also simultaneous (packaging) can help mediate perceived risks citizens’ non-compliance with
منابع مشابه
reflections on taught courses of the iranian ma program in english translation: a mixed-methods study
the issue of curriculum and syllabus evaluation and revision has been in center of attention right from when curriculum came into attention of educational institutions. thus everywhere in the world in educational institutions curricula and syllabi are evaluated and revised based on the goals, the needs, existing content, etc.. in iran any curriculum is designed in a committee of specialists and...
Public preferences for engagement in Health Technology Assessment decision-making: protocol of a mixed methods study
BACKGROUND Much attention in recent years has been given to the topic of public engagement in health technology assessment (HTA) decision-making. HTA organizations spend substantial resources and time on undertaking public engagement, and numerous studies have examined challenges and barriers to engagement in the decision-making process however uncertainty remains as to optimal methods to incor...
متن کاملHarnessing the Potential to Quantify Public Preferences for Healthcare Priorities through Citizens’ Juries
Despite progress towards greater public engagement, questions about the optimal approach to access public preferences remain unanswered. We review two increasingly popular methods for engaging the public in healthcare priority-setting and determining their preferences; the Citizens’ Jury (CJ) and Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE). We discuss the theoretical framework from which each method is de...
متن کاملA Review of Opinion Mining Methods for Analyzing Citizens' Contributions in Public Policy Debate
Electronic Participation (eParticipation), both in its traditional form and in its emerging Web 2.0 based form, results in the production of large quantities of textual contributions of citizens concerning government policies and decisions under formation, which contain valuable relevant opinions and knowledge of the society, however are exploited to a limited only extent. It is of critical imp...
متن کاملpassivity in waiting for godot and endgame: a psychoanalytic reading
this study intends to investigate samuel beckett’s waiting for godot and endgame under the lacanian psychoanalysis. it begins by explaining the most important concepts of lacanian psychoanalysis. the beckettian characters are studied regarding their state of unconscious, and not the state of consciousness as is common in most beckett studies. according to lacan, language plays the sole role in ...
ذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Behavioural public policy
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['2398-0648', '2398-063X']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2022.21